What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in widespread?
When you’re an advert tech nerd, you’ll know the reply instantly.
All of them served as inspiration for the code names related to totally different inside Google tasks that got here to gentle as a part of the DOJ’s ad-tech-focused antitrust lawsuit towards Google.
The disclosure of those initiatives generated a lot dialogue over the previous couple of years, however it’s unlikely we’ll see the federal government get into the weeds on them in the course of the trial itself, which is about to start on Monday morning in a Virginia federal court docket.
You’ll be able to take off your tinfoil hat now
The small print of every initiative are extremely technical and never strictly vital for the Division of Justice to make its case.
If, for instance, the DOJ can show Google maintained a monopoly within the advert server market and used its advert server (previously DFP) to benefit different components of its advert tech stack, together with AdX, that could possibly be sufficient.
However whether or not they’re cited in the course of the trial, revelations about Google’s inside tasks – particularly these associated to Google’s header bidding countermeasures – have been deeply validating to publishers and third-party advert tech platforms.
Guess it’s not paranoia in the event that they’re actually out to get you?
As one advert tech government near the trial advised AdExchanger on background, studying extra about Mission Poirot and Mission Bernanke was like discovering “all that stuff we hear about late at night time on the bar was actually actual.”
Mission Cheat Sheet
Subscribe
AdExchanger Day by day
Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox each weekday.
And now the trial is absolutely beginning.
However first, let’s take a quick stroll down Codename Reminiscence Lane. Right here’s a recap of all of the Google tasks highlighted within the DOJ’s criticism – and some you might not be accustomed to that have been cited in associated court docket filings.
Jedi
To say that Google wasn’t a fan of header bidding is an understatement.
In an effort to counter it and keep management whereas seemingly throwing exchanges a bone, Google devised Jedi, its inside codename for trade bidding (which later turned open bidding).
Via Jedi, Google would permit rival exchanges to compete with its platform in actual time, however with sure limitations. For instance, Google continued to function a second-price public sale and nonetheless had final look.
It’s value noting that the DOJ’s criticism doesn’t reference Jedi Blue – not less than not by that identify. Jedi Blue was the cooperation settlement whereby Google would cost Fb decrease charges and provides Fb benefits in header bidding auctions, resembling velocity and knowledge, in trade for Fb supporting Google’s open bidding product.
However Jedi Blue does make an look within the criticism underneath one other identify – “Community Bidding Settlement” – which implies the small print might come up at trial.
(Though a federal choose in New York dominated in 2022 that the settlement between Google and Fb was not illegal and dismissed that facet of a separate Texas-led advert tech-focused antitrust case towards Google, it’s since turn into honest sport once more after Congress handed a regulation that enables state attorneys common to maintain antitrust instances throughout the jurisdiction they have been filed in. Discovery was reopened within the Texas case and that trial is slated for 2025.)
Mission Bernanke
In response to the DOJ, Google launched Mission Bernanke in 2013 as “a secret scheme to govern the bids” that Google Adverts submitted into its advert trade, AdX, “to be able to win extra aggressive transactions and solidify AdX’s dominance within the trade.”
The DOJ alleged that this allowed Google to “suppress competitors by stopping rival advert exchanges from reaching the transaction quantity and scale essential to compete.”
Though Mission Bernanke options prominently within the DOJ’s 2023 swimsuit, particulars about it have been first revealed in 2021 when an unredacted model of the Texas-led lawsuit towards Google was mistakenly shared with The Wall Road Journal.
Mission Bernanke was named after Ben Bernanke, former chairman of the Federal Reserve, as a result of it resembled “quantitative easing on the advert trade.” Hardy har.
International Bernanke
Mission International Bernanke, carried out in 2014, tweaked the best way Google calculated its margin in Google Adverts by making use of totally different take charges to totally different publishers. The take charge was allegedly increased for publishers that have been unlikely to modify to a rival advert server.
For instance, Google might use its place on each the purchase facet and the promote facet to cost advertisers based mostly on the very best bid, pay publishers on a low bid and use the distinction to extend the bid value to win subsequent auctions in favor of extra “necessary publishers.”
Mission Bell
Beginning in 2014, the DOJ says Google recalibrated Mission Bernanke to lower bids from Google Adverts on AdX for publishers that allowed rival exchanges to purchase stock earlier than AdX.
Via Mission Bell, because it was known as, Google would scale back bids with out telling the advertiser by roughly 20%, and it allegedly advised publishers that utilizing “first-call” know-how, aka header-bidding know-how, would trigger their yield to drop by 20% to 30%.
In response to the DOJ, this “each insulated Google’s advert trade from this new type of competitors and preserved preferential entry for patrons on Google’s advert trade, together with Google Adverts.”
Mission Bell was named after Alexander Graham Bell, who made the primary name. (h/t to Digital Content material Subsequent CEO Jason Kint for unearthing a 2014 e mail trade between Google staff noodling on a reputation)
Mission Poirot
By 2016, Google moved on to Mission Poirot, an effort, because the DOJ put it, to blunt header bidding by “drying out” the competitors.
This concerned shifting transactions towards AdX and away from advert exchanges that have been utilizing header bidding.
Google modified the settings inside DV360 to choose advertisers into Mission Poirot by default – only one% opted out – after which lowered the bids from DV360 to rival exchanges by 10% to 40% and finally by as a lot as 90%, placing AdX able to win these bids.
Mission Poirot was named after Agatha Christie’s iconic and intensely intelligent Belgian detective character, maybe as a result of Google employed a moderately intelligent tactic to detect exchanges partaking in header bidding. If an trade now not used a second-price public sale, that was a reasonably good signal that they have been utilizing header bidding.
Mission Narnia
When Google acquired DoubleClick, there have been privateness insurance policies in place prohibiting Google from combining its consumer information from Search, Gmail, YouTube and different properties with information gathered from non-Google websites.
Mission Narnia, in 2016, concerned Google altering that coverage so all consumer information could possibly be mixed right into a single ID. The DOJ argues that this “proved invaluable to Google’s efforts to construct and keep its monopoly throughout the advert tech trade.”
Who is aware of why it was known as Mission Narnia, contemplating Narnia is an allegory for Christianity. Would love to listen to your theories.
Mission Alchemist
This one doesn’t seem within the DOJ’s criticism, however does get briefly referenced in different court docket filings, together with an skilled report for the plaintiff by Robin S. Lee, a professor of economics at Harvard College.
In a footnote about Tasks Bernanke and Bell, Professor Lee mentions that, in September 2019, Google Adverts up to date the Bernanke algorithms to be appropriate with a unified first-price public sale however with out altering Google’s take charge.
The brand new algorithm was referred to internally as “Alchemist” … perhaps as a result of it was margin magic?
And now the attorneys get their flip
The advert product people aren’t the one ones who get their very own codenamed tasks at Google.
There are mentions of a number of different tasks in a number of court docket paperwork, primarily associated to Google’s efforts to research the worldwide regulatory panorama and provide you with options.
There’s not a lot info on these so-called “Treatment Tasks,” which is how Google’s attorneys referred to them inside a movement they filed to maintain associated paperwork underneath privilege.
However, all the identical, it’s fascinating to see the place Google’s focus has been.
Mission Sunday and Mission Monday
These have been analyses of potential modifications that could possibly be made to Google’s advert tech enterprise in gentle of worldwide regulatory investigations.
Mission Stonehenge and Mission SingleClick
These two additionally seem to have been about analyzing doable cures in response to regulatory curiosity in Google all over the world.
Mission Stonehenge particularly was an evaluation of the implications of ongoing antitrust inquiries.
In response to a redacted December 2021 deposition of an unnamed Google worker, folks on the Google Advert Supervisor staff have been answerable for Mission Stonehenge. It resulted in June 2020.
Mission 1Door
This was a proposal to streamline the three “shopping for doorways” for Advert Supervisor and AdMob, presumably DV360, approved patrons and the Google Show Community. Therefore, one door.
It additionally concerned an evaluation of implications and choices in response to potential regulatory inquiries.
Mission Banksy
You could be sensing a theme: Mission Banksy additionally refers to an evaluation that was carried out of potential cures in response to antitrust regulatory investigations.
Mission Quantize
A request inside Google for authorized recommendation relating to compliance with privateness and competitors legal guidelines.
Mission Garamond
Only a few particulars on this one. It has one thing to do with a information content material licensing program.
Mission Metta
Lastly, Mission Metta (to not be confused with Meta or Mehta!) is Google’s initiative to know and guarantee compliance with the Digital Markets Act in Europe, which is laws to manage the conduct of huge digital platforms. The DMA was handed in 2022 and is now in impact.
Metta can be Google’s response to ongoing antitrust regulatory investigations in Europe, Australia and the UK.
And that’s it. We’re finished. No extra tasks … that we all know of?
Replace 9/6/24 at 2:52 p.m. ET: An earlier model of this story incorrectly mentioned that Jedi Blue was utterly off the desk.
