If Decide Leonie Brinkema, who’s presiding over Google’s advert tech antitrust trial in Virginia, had a catchphrase, it might most likely be “Let’s transfer this alongside.”
For the reason that trial started on September 9, hundreds of paperwork have been entered into proof, and Decide Brinkema has listened to roughly 80 hours of testimony.
Now that the DOJ has rested its case and it’s time for Google to current its protection, the decide has issued clear directions for either side to hurry it up. There’s a motive folks name the US District Court docket for the Jap District of Virginia the “rocket docket.”
However whereas the arguments are beginning to get slightly repetitive, the trial has been a supply of fascinating revelations, a mixture of witness testimony and nuggets unearthed from inside e mail conversations between present and former Google workers.
Rather a lot has already been stated and cited, with extra to return. Listed here are just a few of probably the most notable quotables from the primary two weeks of the trial.
‘Vehemently opposed’
Throughout Brian O’Kelley’s video deposition, it got here out that Prebid.org exists at present as a result of Google pressured the IAB Tech Lab to not take over the code.
The IAB Tech Lab would have been a logical dwelling for Prebid, however Google was no fan of header bidding – and Google was the IAB’s largest monetary contributor on the time. Google can also be an IAB board member.
At one board assembly, it was proposed that the Tech Lab host the Prebid code. However Google was “vehemently opposed,” and so it didn’t occur.
‘Emotional and unproductive’
Right now, Stephanie Layser is the worldwide head of writer advert tech options at AWS. However in 2019, she was VP of advert tech at Information Corp – and she or he was greater than slightly annoyed with sure adjustments to Google’s public sale mannequin.
Subscribe
AdExchanger Each day
Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox each weekday.
Modifications such because the rollout of unified pricing guidelines, which eradicated a writer’s capacity to set variable ground costs. This lack of management might need been the final straw – if Layser hadn’t felt so locked into Google’s sell-side advert tech.
Layser wrote an e mail to Google asking to satisfy about her issues. At that assembly, which was with two feminine Google workers, Layser was informed she was being “emotional and unproductive,” she informed the court docket.
‘Irrationally excessive lease’
It’s been established in the course of the trial that Google fees a 20% take fee for its advert change. Most different exchanges cost someplace within the 10% vary.
Is Google’s 20% reduce value it? Not by itself, in keeping with Google’s personal executives. Google Adverts demand is the sweetener that retains publishers from leaving.
The federal government cited a sequence of emails and messages made to that impact over time by Chris LaSala, Google’s former world product and technique lead for sell-side advert merchandise.
For instance, in a touch upon an undated doc about probably altering the charge construction (which by no means occurred), LaSala referred to the AdX sell-side margin as an “irrationally excessive lease.”
“One may ask why the market continues to bear 20%,” LaSala wrote. “It might be due to adwords bringing liquidity from a long-tail.”
The skilled witness
Based on the DOJ, the connection between AdX and Google Adverts is an instance of unlawful tying.
To assist its argument, the federal government referred to analysis by Robin Lee, a professor of economics at Harvard College and an skilled in platform competitors and two-sided markets.
Based mostly on Dr. Lee’s calculations, if AdX not had entry to Google Adverts demand, writer income would drop by 27.9%. By comparability, no different change would see income lower by any greater than 0.5%. (h/t to Ari Paparo)
Dr. Lee additionally testified that Google has a monopoly over the advert server market as a result of it was attainable to launch very unpopular options – comparable to unified pricing guidelines – with none fallout. Publishers might have complained, however they didn’t really feel capable of depart.
‘An act of God’
As a result of altering advert servers is seemingly one of many circles of hell that Dante forgot to say.
In 2008/2009, shortly after Google’s DoubleClick acquisition, David Rosenblatt, CEO of DoubleClick, described the expertise of fixing advert servers like so: “Takes an act of God to do it.”
Which is why “nothing actually issues however the platform,” Rosenblatt noticed on the time. “Nothing has such excessive switching prices. If there’s a greater community or change, you possibly can simply swap to it. Switching platforms is a nightmare.”
‘Parking it someplace’
However though the platform was and is all vital, different types of competitors crop up and should be addressed.
Earlier than real-time bidding got here to be round 2009, corporations like PubMatic, Rubicon and Admeld have been gaining share by serving to publishers optimize their spend within the waterfall. Google noticed this as a risk and purchased one in all these corporations – Admeld – in 2011.
Did Google purchase it simply to close it down, although?
Sure, in keeping with the DOJ, which pointed to a 2010 e mail through which Neal Mohan, now the CEO of YouTube, again then the person answerable for Google’s show enterprise, wrote: “A method to ensure we don’t get additional behind out there is choosing up the [company] with probably the most traction and parking it someplace.”
Mohan defined that he meant Google deliberate to maintain the corporate operating whereas integrating it into the rebuild of its personal stack. However “parking it someplace” is a tough phrase.
Google shut down Admeld in 2013, two years after shopping for it.
‘The issue is that HB exists :)’
Quick-forward to 2018, and Google executives have been becoming concerned concerning the rise of header bidding, together with that Google’s personal DSP was bidding into header-bidding (HB) auctions. Irony of ironies.
What might be achieved to repair that?
In an e mail change about attainable short-term treatments, Payam Shodjai, then a senior director of product administration for Google’s show and video adverts, made this offhand remark capped with a smiley face.
“It’s extra sophisticated than ‘DBM ought to cease shopping for HB stock.’ The issue isn’t a lot that DBM is shopping for HB stock – the issue is that HB exists :)”
Strolling to China
And since HB exists, so does Prebid, which is now the preferred open-source header-bidding wrapper.
It’s additionally attainable to make use of Prebid with no need an advert server, isn’t it? And if that’s the case, how is it that Google might have a monopoly over the advert server market?
That’s what one in all Google’s attorneys wished to know in the course of the cross-examination of Tom Kershaw, the previous CTO of Rubicon/Magnite, and one of many co-founders of Prebid.
However Kershaw wasn’t having it.
Positive, that’s technically attainable, he stated, not that it’s possible or that anybody would ever do it in the true world.
“It’s like saying I might stroll to China proper now – which I might,” Kershaw stated. “However it might be very tough.”
Talking English once more
And, lastly, former OpenX CEO Tim Cadogan, now the CEO of GoFundMe, maybe spoke for all of us in his dismissal of advert tech jargonese.
Throughout a dialog about passback tags, which function like a fail-safe towards unsold impressions in a waterfall setup, Cadogan had this at present:
“There’s a lot jargon on this business. I’ve acquired to say I’m blissful to have left there, as a result of I can converse English in my new enterprise.”
Meet up with AdExchanger’s trial protection:
And take a look at these glorious sources when you’re at it:
